2020- 2022 Policy Process | Green Party of Canada
Where GPC membership collaborates to develop our policies
G21-D003 Pre-Writ One Page Policy Briefs to Empower EDAs
Submitter Name
Anne Lavender
Ratification Vote Results: Adopted
Proposal
To support consistent messaging, particularly during an election campaign, Federal Council will direct staff to produce snappy one page briefs for all policy priorities as, and when, they are updated, along with each plank in the campaign platform, at least four weeks before the writ is dropped.
Objective
The objective of this directive to Federal Council is to build more EDAs across the country and strengthen their capacity to organize, and build effective, transparent and accountable local organizations capable of organizing membership outreach, fundraising and supporting the election of capable, progressive Green candidates to Parliament.
Benefit
Creating active, open and effective local level EDAs will promote Green Party values and policies, generate credibility, expand membership and raise funds. Strong EDAs, our grassroots, are essential to electing more Green Members of Parliament.
Supporting Comments from Submitter
There are likely only about 100 “existing” EDAs, with varying capacities to function effectively. The current suite of “rules and tools” in the GPC Organizing toolbox as well as webinars for EDAs is impressive, yet more focused on electoral readiness than EDA formation and capacity building. As identified in the EDA Revitalization survey conducted in November 2020 (https://forms.gle/Ct5w25Usmuh71VR47), there remain areas where the current suite of “rules and tools” can be strengthened (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y1jjFDHZeeeLjWbol4AixXH5Ie-FHYPqaIAGhXCyCUQ/edit?usp=sharing), including the need for punchy briefs for each policy and, during election campaigns, each plank in the platform, to support consistent messaging across the country. A one pager, structured with an issue (1 sentence), talking points (3-4 bullets), background (1 paragraph per bullet) and fun facts (punchy and noteworthy one-liner facts).
Green Value(s)
Participatory Democracy
Relation to Existing Policy
Add to current GPC policy.
Amendments (1)
-
Created at
04/06/2022 -
- 0
Currently, there's another amendment being evaluated for this proposal. In order to create a new one, you must wait until the current one is accepted or rejected.
You can also reach the author of this proposal by leaving a comment and try to speed up the resolution of the current amendment.
You can access the current amendment here.
We're building a new kind of politics. One that is open, participatory, and people-powered
If you believe in what we're doing, please consider making a small donation to help us build it
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
Comment details
You are seeing a single comment
View all comments
Conversation with Colin Lathe
I'm not particularily fond of the use of words like 'snappy' or 'punchy' as a way to describe what should essentially be our actual policy and/or platform positions worded in a way that is 'to the point', 'effective' and 'marketable'.
I watched with admiration (and horror) how both Steven Harper and now Doug Ford used a singular and simple but strict messaging tactic to win majorities when they should have been ousted based on awful policies. There is much to learn from this strategy.
As far as who creates these one-pagers, I think it should start with staff - to let this get taken care of by the membership at large, and with no definition or direction of duties is how we never get these much needed documents into the hands of the EDA's now.
Although it's not a mandatory policy at this point, we do ask WeDecide participants to use names that provide some degree of transparency as to whom is making the comment (e.g. Full name or FIrst Name + Initial).
Loading comments ...