Collaborative Proposal Creation
Create, improve and sponsor proposals in a respectful, fully bilingual environment. Grow proposals in the "Hothouse", for promotion to the "Workshop", to become official GPC policy.
Proposal text
Be It Resolved that our caucus introduce a bill to improve the minimum large corporate tax to 5% a year of taxable income.
Type of Proposal
Public policy that the party would represent
Objective / Benefit
Minimum Large Corporate Tax
If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
N/A
List any supporting evidence for your proposal
Currently some $23.4 billion a year in assessed income and other taxes is not collected by the Canadian government
Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?
Large Corporations
Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
Yes
Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
English
This proposal has been accepted because:
79.0% of members voted in favour of adopting this motion in the all-member vote.
Amendments (1)
-
Created at
22/05/2024 -
- 0
We're building a new kind of politics. One that is open, participatory, and people-powered
If you believe in what we're doing, please consider making a small donation to help us build it
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
Comment details
You are seeing a single comment
View all comments
April 30th, 2024. I have looked over the various responses and my original intent was to see if an ordinary member could direct the parliamentary caucus to introduce a bill in the House of Commons of Canada. So this is a directive motion not a policy motion.
Beyond that I simply wanted the MPs caucus to propose a bill to require large corporations to pay a minimum tax each year and simply chose 5% a year because that is the minimum amount that each citizen pays to the BC government each year.
I simply do not believe that large corporations, new, in development or whatever, should pay less income tax than ordinary Canadian taxpayers.
As member of 30 years I was made to understand that each member when bringing forward a resolution lost individual control of that motion when it reached the membership. In this case 60.9% of the members in the bonsor process agreed that this motion should go forward to the membership for ratification.
I therefore do not believe it is my right to decide which amendments should be considered and which ones should not as that is the role of the members to decide that and I can comment at time of adoption.
Respectfully
Andy Shadrack
Loading comments ...