Continuous Motion Development
Online proposal development for the Green Party of Canada
Proposing Limits on Policy Proposal Submissions in the Green Party
As committed members invested in shaping the future of our party's public policy and governance, it's important to acknowledge some of the challenges we face. In the most recent proposal submission cycle, nine (9) members submitted thirty-one (31) of the forty-nine (49) proposals. This raises concerns from both an equity standpoint, as well as in terms of volunteer resources. In this blog, we will explore considering limits on the number of policy proposals each member can submit per cycle, aiming to foster a more inclusive and efficient approach to policy development.
The Need for Limits
- Equitable Participation: By limiting the number of policy proposals each member can submit at a time, we promote equitable participation in the policymaking process. This ensures that all voices within our party have the opportunity to contribute ideas and shape our platform, rather than allowing a select few to dominate the conversation.
- Quality Over Quantity: Focusing on a smaller number of high-quality proposals allows us to dedicate sufficient time and resources to thoroughly evaluate each idea. Quality proposals are more likely to garner support from party members and have a greater impact on shaping our policies and election platforms.
- Streamlined Process: A smaller volume of proposals makes the policymaking process more manageable for our volunteer-led teams. It allows for more efficient review, discussion, and decision-making, leading to a more streamlined and effective process overall.
- Encouragement of Collaboration: Limiting the number of proposals encourages collaboration and coalition-building among party members. Instead of submitting multiple proposals, members are incentivized to work together to develop comprehensive and cohesive policy initiatives.
Addressing the Risks
- Overwhelming Volume: The current situation creates a large volume of submissions that strains our volunteer capacity. This can lead to proposals being rushed or overlooked, possibly compromising their quality and effectiveness.
- Limited Capacity: Our volunteer-led proposal process operates with limited capacity. Without limits on the number of submissions, we risk burning out our volunteers and diminishing the quality of their work. Setting reasonable limits ensures that our volunteers can dedicate their time and energy effectively.
- Inadequate Consideration: Members find it challenging to thoroughly review large numbers of policy proposals. While the Continuous Motion Development process aids in managing the number of policies under consideration at any given moment, the ongoing influx of proposals could potentially overwhelm our capacity for thorough evaluation. Recognizing this challenge, some provincial Green Parties have introduced prioritization votes, effectively constraining the number of proposals reviewed within a given year. This strategic approach ensures that each proposal receives the attention and scrutiny it deserves, fostering a more deliberate and effective policy making process.
Proposed Solutions
- Implementing Submission Limits: We propose implementing a reasonable limit on the number of policy proposals each member can submit in each proposal cycle. This limit should strike a balance between encouraging participation and ensuring manageable workload for our volunteers.
- Encouraging Collaboration: Emphasize the importance of collaboration among party members and EDAs in developing policy proposals. Encourage members and EDAs to work together to refine and consolidate their ideas into comprehensive and impactful proposals.
Conclusion
By implementing limits on policy proposal submissions, we can strengthen the integrity and effectiveness of our policymaking process. These measures promote equitable participation, ensure quality over quantity, streamline our processes, and mitigate the risks associated with overwhelming volume and lack of review. Let us work together to build a more inclusive, efficient, and responsive policymaking process that truly reflects the values and priorities of the Green Party. How many policy proposals should a member be allowed to submit per policy cycle, is a great topic for debate in the WeDecide debate forum.
List of Sponsors
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
Comment details
You are seeing a single comment
View all comments
I think the conversation between PDPC and members needs to widen, on how we develop policy in a way that stays true to grassroots processes yet is manageable for all. On the blog linked above, they mention two proposed solutions. First, to limit proposals to one per member, and second, to "encourage" collaboration in and among EDAs. I just see precious little of that, unfortunately, but maybe I'm wrong? That should be the focus of some PDPC facilitated workshops, I hope??
At this nascent stage, it's wise to also loop in Shadow Cabinet, Caucus, and staff. How we make policy is evolving, fast. If we're to grow successfully into a major Party, we need to talk about this: generate safe parameters and timelines to experiment, then formalize a new process around "what works".
I propose that wedecide hosts "Policy Table Talks", essentially citizen-assembly style meetings to share thoughts, and ultimately generate new policy proposal motions.
I also propose "Policy Circles" online group convos here on wedecide that coalesce around specific issues - fomenting home centres for excellence of Greens with both academic and lived expertise. These would be places to help use the member-made policies to make fast, excellent position statements for the media, and generate One Pagers for candidates as per an election readiness strategy.
Loading comments ...