Deletions
-Introductory TextThis section is where you provide the rationale or context for the collaborative-draft. Aim to be factual, not speculative. Briefly identify the problem. This section is the-equivalent of Whereas Statements. You do not have to use Whereas Statements.Proposal Statement-(operative clause)This section is where the policy statement is entered. Public policy should be-written to allow Green Party of Canada MPs the flexibility to choose any appropriate strategy or-tactic to achieve the desired outcome.-Type of ProposalPublic policy that the party would representObjective / BenefitThis section is used-to identify the benefit or goal of the policy statement, and why or how this policy is of benefit to-Canadians.If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?Review-the Green Policy Book to ensure you are not submitting a duplicate policy. If this policy revises,-replaces or removes an existing policy, identify the policy and the the impact. Example: replaces-G22-P106, revises G22-P106, rescinds G22-P106.List any supporting evidence for your proposalThis-section is used to identify up to 5 references to support this collaborative draft. Strong-references are free of bias and backed with evidence. Try to use primary sources (first hand-evidence) or information.-The CRAAP test is helpful to evlauate the credibility of the source (reference):-Currency: Is the source up-to-date? Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research?- Authority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and
- trustworthy in their field?
-Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly? Purpose: What was the-motive behind publishing this source?-Avoid using videos that contain edited clips from the original source, as they may lack important-context and could present biased information.Does this proposal affect any particular group and what-efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?This section is used to identify the-stakeholder engagement that influenced the development of the policy.Jurisdiction: Is this proposal-under federal jurisdiction?YesPlease indicate the language the proposal is being submitted-in.English
Additions
- +decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.intro.label
- +This section is where you provide the rationale or context for the policy. Aim to be factual, not
- +speculative. Briefly identify the problem. This section is the equivalent of Whereas Statements. You
- +do not have to use Whereas Statements.decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.text.labelThis section is
- +where the policy statement is entered. Public policy should be written to allow Green Party of
- +Canada MPs the flexibility to choose any appropriate strategy or tactic to achieve the desired
- +outcome. The policy statement is the only section of the proposal that is entered into the Green
- +Policy Book
- +decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.type.labeldecidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.type.option.policydecidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.objective.labelThis
- +section is used to identify the benefit or goal of the policy statement, and why or how this policy
- +is of benefit to Canadians.decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.replacement.textBefore submitting a
- +policy idea, review the Green Policy Book to ensure you are not submitting a duplicate policy. If
- +this policy revises, replaces or removes an existing policy, identify the policy and the the impact.
- +Example: replaces G22-P106, revises G22-P106, rescinds
- +G22-P106.decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.evidence.labelThis section is used to identify up to 5
- +references to support the policy proposal Strong references are free of bias and backed by
- +evidence. Try to use primary sources (first hand evidence) or information.
- +The CRAAP test is helpful to evaluate the credibility of the source (reference):
- +Currency: Is the source up-to-date?
- +Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research?
- Authority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and
- trustworthy in their field?
- +Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly?
- +Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?
- +Avoid using videos that contain clips that have been removed from the original source, as the
- +secondary source may lack important context and could present biased
- +information.decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.consultation.labelThis section is used to identify the
- +stakeholder engagement used to develop the
- +policy.decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.jusrisdiction.labeldecidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.jusrisdiction.option.1decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.original.language.label
- +decidim.gpc.process.form.proposal.language.english
0 comments
Loading comments ...
Add your comment (Comments are visible to the internet)
Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.
Loading comments ...