19th General Meeting

"The greatest threat to our planet is the belief that someone else will save it." - Robert Swann

24 Feb - 25 Feb

Sessions

Show original text Warning: Content might be automatically translated and not be 100% accurate.

Back to list

Allowing in-person General Meetings

Eric Gilmour

23/02/2024 13:44

Rejected

Introductory Statement: At the last general meeting, during the height of the pandemic, an amendment was made that prevents the Party from holding in-person only General Meetings. While that may have made sense at the time, over 2 years later this needs to be reviewed as in-person meetings are a critical part of social organizations such as political parties.
Emergency Motion Statement: Article 8.7 be amended to read: "A General Meeting may be held in person, online, or a hybrid of online and in person."
Type of Emergency Motion: A constitutional amendment to change the constitution or bylaws
Benefit: This amend gives the Party flexibility to host General Meetings in a way that makes sense for that particular cycle, either online, in person, or a hybrid of the two. Currently technological and organizational limits make hybrid meetings nearly impossible, hence preventing any in-person get togethers. The lack of in-person gathering hampers the ability of members and volunteers to connect with one another, forming bonds and connections, sharing stories and experience in formal and informal ways. So much happens outside the official programming of a meeting that can't be replicated in an online environment.
Who does this motion impact?: Party members, volunteers, and staff
Impact on exisiting GPC policy.: Not applicable (e.g., directive to council, constitutional amendment)
Green Values: Sustainability

Social Justice

Participatory Democracy
Supporting Evidence
Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?: Unsure or Not applicable (e.g. directives and constitutional changes)
Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.: English

Filter results for category: Constitutional

This proposal has been rejected because:

This motion failed to meet the 66.6% threshold of support needed to be considered as an emergency motion. Therefore, this motion was not presented for consideration by membership.

We're building a new kind of politics. One that is open, participatory, and people-powered

Donate $10

If you believe in what we're doing, please consider making a small donation to help us build it

Reference: PVC-PROP-2024-02-5887

Version number 2 (of 2) see other versions

Check fingerprint

Share link

Comment details

Order by:

You are seeing a single comment

View all comments

Stuart Hunter

23/02/2024 18:15

IMHO, the in-person part is essential, the "convention" part, and doing both at once is logistically/technologically complicated & expensive, so allowing them to happen separately is good, to give us the option, for the time being at least. After this GM I get the sense we are de-emphasizing how much business absolutely Must be conducted at GMs anyway. Of course ideally business is conducted with as many people as possible physically and virtually present. But the non-plenary bits of a Convention are also extremely important

19th General Meeting

"The greatest threat to our planet is the belief that someone else will save it." - Robert Swann

Allowing in-person General Meetings

Fingerprint

Share:

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

Comment details

You are seeing a single comment

Please sign in