Information about the cookies used on the website
We use cookies on our website to improve the performance and content of the site. The cookies enable us to provide a more individual user experience and social media channels.

Collaborative Proposal Creation

Create, improve and sponsor proposals in a respectful, fully bilingual environment. Grow proposals in the "Hothouse", for promotion to the "Workshop", to become official GPC policy.

Phase 4 of 4
Proposal Ratification and Implementation 26/02/2024 - ?
Process phases
Show original text Warning: Content might be automatically translated and not be 100% accurate.

Changes at "Establish a Committee on Co-Leadership"

Compare view mode:

Scope

Deletions
Additions

Body

Deletions
  • -Proposal textBE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike a Committee on Co-Leadership to, if
  • -determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional changes for members to adopt
  • -co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should include evaluating
  • -international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.Type of ProposalA directive to
  • -ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an actionObjective / BenefitThe committee could consider
  • -questions such as:
  • 1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • 2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • 3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • 4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • 5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • 6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • 7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • 8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • 9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • 10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • -11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?If your proposal replaces an existing policy
  • -or policies, which one does it replace?N/AList any supporting evidence for your proposalN/ADoes this
  • -proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or
  • -groups?N/AJurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?YesPlease indicate the language
  • -the proposal is being submitted in.English
Additions
  • +Proposal text
  • +
  • +BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • +Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • +changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • +include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • +
  • +Type of Proposal
  • +
  • +A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • +
  • +Objective / Benefit
  • +
  • +The committee could consider questions such as:
  • 1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • +
  • 2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • +
  • 3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • +
  • 4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • +
  • 5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • +
  • 6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • +
  • 7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • +
  • 8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • +
  • 9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • +
  • 10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • +
  • +11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • +
  • +If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • +group or groups?
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • +
  • +Yes
  • +
  • +Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • +
  • +English
  • -Proposal textBE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike a Committee on Co-Leadership to, if
  • -determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional changes for members to adopt
  • -co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should include evaluating
  • -international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.Type of ProposalA directive to
  • -ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an actionObjective / BenefitThe committee could consider
  • -questions such as:
  • +Proposal text
  • +
  • +BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • +Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • +changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • +include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • +
  • +Type of Proposal
  • +
  • +A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • +
  • +Objective / Benefit
  • +
  • +The committee could consider questions such as:
  • 1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • +
  • 2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • +
  • 3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • +
  • 4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • +
  • 5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • +
  • 6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • +
  • 7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • +
  • 8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • +
  • 9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • +
  • 10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • -11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?If your proposal replaces an existing policy
  • -or policies, which one does it replace?N/AList any supporting evidence for your proposalN/ADoes this
  • -proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or
  • -groups?N/AJurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?YesPlease indicate the language
  • -the proposal is being submitted in.English
  • +
  • +11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • +
  • +If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • +group or groups?
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • +
  • +Yes
  • +
  • +Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • +
  • +English
Compare view mode:

Scope

Deletions
Additions

Body

Deletions
  • -Proposal textBE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike a Committee on Co-Leadership to, if
  • -determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional changes for members to adopt
  • -co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should include evaluating
  • -international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.Type of ProposalA directive to
  • -ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an actionObjective / BenefitThe committee could consider
  • -questions such as:
  • 1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • 2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • 3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • 4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • 5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • 6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • 7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • 8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • 9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • 10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • -11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?If your proposal replaces an existing policy
  • -or policies, which one does it replace?N/AList any supporting evidence for your proposalN/ADoes this
  • -proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or
  • -groups?N/AJurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?YesPlease indicate the language
  • -the proposal is being submitted in.English
Additions
  • +Proposal text
  • +
  • +BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • +Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • +changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • +include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • +
  • +Type of Proposal
  • +
  • +A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • +
  • +Objective / Benefit
  • +
  • +The committee could consider questions such as:
  • 1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • +
  • 2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • +
  • 3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • +
  • 4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • +
  • 5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • +
  • 6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • +
  • 7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • +
  • 8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • +
  • 9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • +
  • 10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • +
  • +11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • +
  • +If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • +group or groups?
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • +
  • +Yes
  • +
  • +Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • +
  • +English
  • -Proposal textBE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike a Committee on Co-Leadership to, if
  • -determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional changes for members to adopt
  • -co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should include evaluating
  • -international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.Type of ProposalA directive to
  • -ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an actionObjective / BenefitThe committee could consider
  • -questions such as:
  • +Proposal text
  • +
  • +BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • +Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • +changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • +include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • +
  • +Type of Proposal
  • +
  • +A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • +
  • +Objective / Benefit
  • +
  • +The committee could consider questions such as:
  • 1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • +
  • 2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • +
  • 3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • +
  • 4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • +
  • 5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • +
  • 6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • +
  • 7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • +
  • 8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • +
  • 9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • +
  • 10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • -11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?If your proposal replaces an existing policy
  • -or policies, which one does it replace?N/AList any supporting evidence for your proposalN/ADoes this
  • -proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or
  • -groups?N/AJurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?YesPlease indicate the language
  • -the proposal is being submitted in.English
  • +
  • +11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • +
  • +If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • +group or groups?
  • +
  • +N/A
  • +
  • +Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • +
  • +Yes
  • +
  • +Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • +
  • +English

Establish a Committee on Co-Leadership

Proposal text

This motion directs Federal Council and the Constitutional Reform Committee (CRC) to strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the CRC to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the earliest feasible General Meeting or through a Continuous Motion Development Process. The Committee’s work should include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.

Type of Proposal

A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action

Objective / Benefit

The committee could consider questions such as:

  1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?

If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?

N/A

List any supporting evidence for your proposal

N/A

Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?

N/A

Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?

Yes

Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.

English

Version number 3 out of 7 Show all versions Go back to proposal
Version author
Avatar: John Willson John Willson
Version created at 14/09/2023 08:29

You need to enable all cookies in order to see this content.

Change cookie settings