Information about the cookies used on the website
We use cookies on our website to improve the performance and content of the site. The cookies enable us to provide a more individual user experience and social media channels.

Collaborative Proposal Creation

Create, improve and sponsor proposals in a respectful, fully bilingual environment. Grow proposals in the "Hothouse", for promotion to the "Workshop", to become official GPC policy.

Phase 4 of 4
Proposal Ratification and Implementation 26/02/2024 - ?
Process phases
Show original text Warning: Content might be automatically translated and not be 100% accurate.

Changes at "Establish a Committee on Co-Leadership"

Compare view mode:

Body

Deletions
  • Proposal text
  • BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • Type of Proposal
  • A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • Objective / Benefit
  • The committee could consider questions such as:
  • -1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • -
  • -2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • -
  • -3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • -
  • -4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • -
  • -5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • -
  • -6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • -
  • -7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • -
  • -8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • -
  • -9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • -
  • -10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • -
  • -11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • -
  • -
  • If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • N/A
  • List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • N/A
  • Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • group or groups?
  • N/A
  • Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • Yes
  • Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • English
Additions
  • Proposal text
  • BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • Type of Proposal
  • A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • Objective / Benefit
  • The committee could consider questions such as:
  • +* Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • +* What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • +* Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • +* How should responsibilities be managed?
  • +* How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • +* How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • +* What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • +* How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • +* How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • +* Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • +* Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • N/A
  • List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • N/A
  • Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • group or groups?
  • N/A
  • Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • Yes
  • Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • English
  • Proposal text
  • BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • Type of Proposal
  • A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • Objective / Benefit
  • The committee could consider questions such as:
  • -1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • -
  • -2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • -
  • -3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • -
  • -4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • -
  • -5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • -
  • -6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • -
  • -7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • -
  • -8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • -
  • -9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • -
  • -10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • -
  • -11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • -
  • -
  • +* Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • +* What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • +* Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • +* How should responsibilities be managed?
  • +* How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • +* How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • +* What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • +* How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • +* How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • +* Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • +* Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • N/A
  • List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • N/A
  • Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • group or groups?
  • N/A
  • Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • Yes
  • Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • English
Compare view mode:

Body

Deletions
  • Proposal text
  • BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • Type of Proposal
  • A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • Objective / Benefit
  • The committee could consider questions such as:
  • -1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • -
  • -2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • -
  • -3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • -
  • -4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • -
  • -5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • -
  • -6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • -
  • -7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • -
  • -8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • -
  • -9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • -
  • -10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • -
  • -11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • -
  • -
  • If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • N/A
  • List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • N/A
  • Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • group or groups?
  • N/A
  • Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • Yes
  • Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • English
Additions
  • Proposal text
  • BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • Type of Proposal
  • A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • Objective / Benefit
  • The committee could consider questions such as:
  • +* Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • +* What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • +* Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • +* How should responsibilities be managed?
  • +* How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • +* How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • +* What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • +* How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • +* How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • +* Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • +* Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • N/A
  • List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • N/A
  • Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • group or groups?
  • N/A
  • Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • Yes
  • Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • English
  • Proposal text
  • BE IT RESOLVED THAT Federal Council strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the
  • Constitutional Renewal Committee to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional
  • changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the 2024 General Meeting. The Committee’s work should
  • include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.
  • Type of Proposal
  • A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action
  • Objective / Benefit
  • The committee could consider questions such as:
  • -1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • -
  • -2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • -
  • -3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • -
  • -4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  • -
  • -5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • -
  • -6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • -
  • -7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • -
  • -8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • -
  • -9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • -
  • -10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • -
  • -11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • -
  • -
  • +* Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  • +* What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  • +* Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  • +* How should responsibilities be managed?
  • +* How should conflict and succession be managed?
  • +* How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  • +* What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  • +* How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  • +* How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  • +* Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  • +* Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?
  • If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
  • N/A
  • List any supporting evidence for your proposal
  • N/A
  • Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the
  • group or groups?
  • N/A
  • Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
  • Yes
  • Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
  • English

Establish a Committee on Co-Leadership

Proposal text

This motion directs Federal Council and the Constitutional Reform Committee (CRC) to strike an Ad Hoc Co-Leadership Subcommittee under the CRC to, if determined appropriate, recommend by-law or constitutional changes for members to adopt co-leadership at the earliest feasible General Meeting or through a Continuous Motion Development Process. The Committee’s work should include evaluating international practices and surveying and consulting members and EDAs.

Type of Proposal

A directive to ask the party’s Federal Council to consider an action

Objective / Benefit

The committee could consider questions such as:

  1. Does Co-Leadership suit the GPC and Canadian politics?
  2. What are the trade-offs of the different Co-Leadership models used internationally?
  3. Should Co-Leaders be elected in pairs or as individuals?
  4. How should responsibilities be managed?
  5. How should conflict and succession be managed?
  6. How does co-leadership change the Deputy Leader role(s)?
  7. What diversity/language requirements are appropriate?
  8. How should Elections Canada responsibilities be managed?
  9. How should Federal Council adapt to accommodate Co-Leadership?
  10. Should Leaders be able to run against Co-Leaders in the same Leadership Race? (See comments)
  11. Should the number of co-leaders be limited to two?

If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?

N/A

List any supporting evidence for your proposal

N/A

Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?

N/A

Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?

Yes

Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.

English

Version number 4 out of 7 Show all versions Go back to proposal
Version author
Avatar: John Willson John Willson
Version created at 18/09/2023 14:02

You need to enable all cookies in order to see this content.

Change cookie settings